Introduction

The relationship between Gandhiji and Vallabhbhai Patel, both well-known Indian leaders of the mid-20th century, and their stance on the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a Hindu nationalist organization, has been a subject of significant interest in history. This article explores whether these prominent figures ever opposed the ideology of the RSS and whether they were against the organization.

Background on Gandhiji and Vallabhbhai Patel

Both Gandhiji and Vallabhbhai Patel were Sanatani Hindus, with a strong connection to Hindu traditions and practices. Gandhiji often referred to himself as a proud Sanatani Hindu and was well-versed in ancient Hindu scriptures such as the Bhagavad Gita, the Vedas, and the Upanishads. In contrast, Vallabhbhai Patel was more reserved about discussing Hinduism, focusing instead on his work as a legal practitioner and a respected politician.

Mahatma Gandhiji and the RSS

The RSS is known for its active engagement in social service activities, often aligning itself with political objectives rather than preaching religious texts like the Bhagavad Gita, the Vedas, and the Upanishads. This approach to Hinduism through social service rather than religious teachings has often been at odds with Gandhiji's own interpretation and practice of Hinduism.

Despite these ideological differences, Gandhiji remained open to understanding the ideology and reasoning behind the RSS. For instance, he visited an RSS camp and appreciated the unity among its members, especially the fact that they could transcend caste barriers for a common cause. However, tensions arose when Gandhiji was assassinated in 1948, and the RSS was mistakenly targeted by the public and authorities.

Following this event, several assassination attempts were made against Gandhiji since 1934. Most of these attempts were carried out by individuals from Maharashtra, and some culprits were even arrested by the police. However, Gandhiji, displaying his empathetic nature, sought to understand the ideology and reasoning behind these aggressive actions, which highlights his commitment to peaceful resolution and dialogue rather than outright opposition.

Vallabhbhai Patel and the RSS

Vallabhbhai Patel, an instrumental figure in India's independence movement, played a crucial role in managing the aftermath of Gandhiji's assassination. He acted as a mediator and organizer for the national mourning and supported efforts to enhance communal harmony.

When Gandhiji was murdered by Godse, the RSS was one of several organizations under suspicion. However, investigations later confirmed that the RSS was not directly responsible for the assassination. Nevertheless, Vallabhbhai Patel was instrumental in handling the complex and delicate political situation that followed, demonstrating his leadership and diplomatic skills.

Banning the RSS by Vallabhbhai Patel

Following Gandhiji's assassination, Vallabhbhai Patel took measures to address the growing tensions and communal divisions. One notable step was the temporary ban on the RSS. However, Vallabhbhai Patel did not pursue a deep crackdown on the organization's structure; rather, he focused on containment and dissociation. This approach reflected his pragmatism and belief in the importance of peaceful resolution over punitive measures.

Gandhiji and Vallabhbhai Patel shared a common goal of a peaceful India, but their methods and approaches often differed. While Gandhiji was more inclined towards passive resistance and personal understanding, Vallabhbhai Patel focused on practical solutions and statecraft. Their relationship with the RSS was complex, but fundamentally based on a shared commitment to national unity and communal harmony.

Conclusion and Reflection

The historical relationship between Gandhiji and Vallabhbhai Patel, and their view of the RSS, sheds light on the nuanced dynamics of Indian politics and society in the mid-20th century. Their differing perspectives on ideology and practice offer valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities of reconciling diverse visions for a future India. While their relationship was marked by both cooperation and conflict, their shared goals and commitment to the well-being of the nation ultimately defined their legacy.