Why the Pseudo-Seculars in India Are Silent on the Killing of Hindu Saints in Maharashtra

Why the Pseudo-Seculars in India Are Silent on the Killing of Hindu Saints in Maharashtra

In a nation where nuanced views often get overshadowed by sensationalism, the question arises—why do pseudo-seculars remain silent on the killings of Hindu saints in Maharashtra, India? This silence is disheartening and contradictory to their supposed stance for pluralistic, secular values.

The Role of Pseudo-Seculars in Indian Politics

Among the various echelons of Indian society, pseudo-seculars often stand out for their inconsistent and often self-serving approach to communal issues. These individuals or groups, who claim to support secular principles but act with biases and agendas, frequently display their prejudices and affiliations in overt or subtle ways. Their actions and reactions to news and events often challenge the very essence of what secularism stands for.

Comparison with Secular and Congress

Secular and Congress advocates can ask the same question of their own. Why, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Amit Shah remain quiet, are the BJP's paid IT cells freely maligning Sonia Gandhi as a "bar dancer"? This raises an important question about the values and standards upheld in our society. If individuals holding political power can abase a respected figure, what protections does an average, everyday woman have?

Blindness to Injustice

Sometimes, it seems like some sections of society are blind to the wrongs committed by their own people and ideologies. This blindness is especially evident in instances where Hindutva forces support the killers, as seen in the case of Inspector Subodh in Bulandshahar. Despite the strong support from the Chief Minister and Hindutva groups, Inspector Subodh’s family can hardly expect justice in the current Hindu Rashtra. This episode is a clear reminder that justice often takes a backseat to communal and ideological biases.

Importance of Equal Condemnation

Similar to the killing of Inspector Subodh, the killing in Palghar must also be condemned as strongly. In both cases, there have been attempts to downplay the gravity of the incidents, with false rumors and police incompetence being cited as the primary causes. It is crucial that the guilty are severely punished and justice is served promptly.

Role of Media and Subservience to Ideology

Communal media often play a significant role in spreading false narratives and sensationalism. Liberal voices, while condemning the Palghar lynching, are often overshadowed by the hate propaganda perpetuated by these media channels. The so-called "communal" label is often twisted to suit the agenda of instilling fear and enmity among communities.

Questioning the Motives of Communal Media

Three individuals were lynched in Palghar, a tragic occurrence that should not be used as a platform for further division. It is disheartening to see how rumor mongers and hate merchants profit from such events, tarnishing the public's trust in media and institutions.

The Specific Incident in Palghar

When discussing the specific incident in Palghar, it is crucial to not twist the facts to spark communal tensions. The killing was a case of mistaken identity, driven by false information spread among a small tribal community. The accused were granted bail, but the wife of the slain policeman is now receiving threats. This highlights the need for robust legal and security measures.

Call to Action and Community Responsibility

Communities and individuals must take an active role in denouncing and preventing such incidents. We must not allow fear and ignorance to govern our actions. Institutions like Quora should be vigilant in moderating content that could incite violence and communal tensions.

Conclusion

The silence or selective condemnation of such incidents by pseudo-seculars is a call to action for all of us. It is time to stand up for justice, equality, and pluralistic values. The Pseudo-seculars must demonstrate a commitment to secularism and justice, or risk becoming part of the problem rather than the solution.